Here at the frontier, the leaves fall like rain. Although my neighbors are all barbarians, and you, you are a thousand miles away, there are still two cups at my table.


Ten thousand flowers in spring, the moon in autumn, a cool breeze in summer, snow in winter. If your mind isn't clouded by unnecessary things, this is the best season of your life.

~ Wu-men ~


Friday, October 16, 2026

Tinkering


A Lifetime of Tinkering

Inhabiting a Life

“Philosophy practiced is the goal of learning.” - Thoreau

There comes a time when a man has to decide whether he is still in the arena of life. I do not mean whether he is winning, or whether anyone is watching. I mean whether he is still willing to take part: to remain curious, test himself, change his mind, work on his body, learn something difficult, and to be altered by what he learns.

I see men around my age beginning to throw in the towel. They are turning to mush physically, mentally, and spiritually. I do not say that with contempt. Age brings real losses, and every man carries burdens that are invisible to everyone else. But I want no part of surrendering before surrender is required of me.

The image that stays with me is the man in the arena who refuses to leave. He may be slower than he once was. He may have scars, limitations, and less time ahead of him than behind. None of that disqualifies him. He is still practicing, paying attention, and becoming.

This essay is not the announcement of a philosophy I have finally completed. If anything, it is a report from the workshop. My life has been a lifetime of tinkering: trying something, observing what happens, making an adjustment, discarding what no longer works, and beginning again. The phrase may sound modest, but I have come to think that tinkering is serious business. It is how an abstraction acquires hands and feet. It is how a belief becomes a practice, and how a practice slowly changes the person who performs it.

I have read philosophy, Eastern and Western, for most of my life. But Thoreau’s sentence provides the standard: philosophy practiced is the goal of learning. An idea may be elegant, moving, or profound, but what does it look like when I get out of bed in the morning? Until an idea reaches life, it remains unfinished.

For years I might have said that I practiced martial arts. Increasingly, I think martial arts have been practicing me. I began with techniques, forms, teachers, traditions, and the ordinary desire to become more skillful. Somewhere along the way, the boundaries became less clear. I may not have found many answers, but the questions kept dropping away. What I learned in practice began appearing in the rest of my life, while changes in the rest of my life began appearing in my practice.

Training under a senior Japanese instructor in Aikido taught me something about Budo, which is the study of the Way by means of Japanese martial arts. I found that idea useful, but limiting. There are plenty of Ways, so I coined the term for myself: "Budo with a small b."

This may be what I mean by budo with a small b. Not a particular martial art, not necessarily even a martial art, but the habits of attention learned through sincere practice and carried into the whole of life. The small letter prevents the word from becoming monumental. It brings the Way down from the sign above the dojo and places it underfoot: meeting resistance, receiving correction, and beginning again.

“If you cannot find the truth right in front of you, where do you expect to find it?” - Zen Master Dogen

That question turns my attention away from some imagined elsewhere. The material is already here: this body, this marriage, the dog walk, the books at hand, the Taijiquan form I have practiced. This is not the scenery surrounding the real work. This is the work.

Recently, while practicing, I noticed tension in my shoulders. The tension had probably been there for years. I did not defeat it or command it to disappear. I noticed it, simply stayed with it, and allowed muscles that had been freeloading to begin doing their proper share of work. In the days afterward, my posture changed. I stood straighter, my chest opened, my shoulders moved back, and perhaps my thinking became a bit clearer. Nothing had been added. Something unnecessary had begun to fall away.

“I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free.” - Michelangelo

That small event contains much of what practice has taught me. Progress is not always the acquisition of another ability. Sometimes it is the removal of interference. I do not imagine that a perfected self is hidden inside me, waiting to be uncovered. But I do recognize the carving away of unnecessary tension, old fears, habitual captivity, and limitations I once imposed upon myself. Much of my tinkering has been a process of subtraction.

What is actually necessary here? Once I can perceive what is actually happening, I may discover that much of what I was defending was never under attack. The body learns to stop wasting itself.

This has changed what training means to me as I grow older. Physical training is not an attempt to pretend that I am young. It is a refusal to become absent from my own body. Strength and mobility are ways of remaining available to life. The workout, the walk, and the form practice are ways of inhabiting the only body through which I will ever meet the world.

“If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost; that is where they should be. Now put the foundations under them.” - Thoreau

A tradition is not a cage, but neither is it raw material for whatever I feel like inventing. It is a standard against which I can test my understanding. A tradition may be received intact, but once it has been deeply absorbed, it can only be expressed through the individuality of the person who carries it.

I remain loyal to several traditions, even though I no longer feel the need to be bound by them.

"I am an artist at living. My life is my work of art." - D. T. Suzuki

Are we not all artists with our lives as the canvas? That statement once might have sounded grandiose to me. Now it seems practical.

Art is not a performance staged for an audience. It is made from the ordinary materials of a life: conversation, attention, and repair. Much of it disappears as soon as it is made. Its medium is time, and its only proof is the quality of the life being lived.

Art is the artist and any artifacts he's made are the flotsam and jetsam of his passage through life.

You cannot paint with someone else’s brush. I can learn from teachers, borrow methods, and submit myself to standards; I should. But no teacher can perform my practice for me, and no philosophy can inhabit my particular life in advance. Eventually, what I have learned must pass through my own hands. This is not a license for self-indulgence. It is responsibility. If my life is my work, I cannot blame the brush.

The metaphor of art also leaves room for experimentation. Reality supplies the test. I have become less interested in defending every past choice as though consistency were a virtue by itself. A discarded opinion may be evidence that attention is still alive.

I have noticed opinions and preferences falling away, as have some self-imposed limitations. This is not indifference. It feels more like becoming less encumbered. Each abandoned certainty returns a little energy that was being spent maintaining it. There is more room to see what is in front of me. Recognition is different from figuring something out.

Figuring proceeds step by step and can tie itself into a Gordian knot. Recognition cuts through the knot. Suddenly I see that I have been tightening my shoulders, living by a borrowed assumption, or obeying a boundary that no longer exists. The change may have been prepared by years of practice, but when it comes, it arrives all at once: of course.

The movement works in both directions. When I discover a new connection or release unnecessary tension in my practice, something may shift in ordinary life. When something loosens in ordinary life, my practice changes too.

This reciprocity has made it impossible for me to regard practice as a compartment. A dojo can have walls, but the Way does not. The real measure is not only how the Taijiquan form looks during an hour of practice. It is how I stand in the kitchen, how I respond when plans go wrong, how quickly I notice that I have contracted, and whether I can release what the moment does not require.

The same principle applies to reading. I own more books than I will ever finish, and I am content to close one that is not speaking to me. This is not disrespect for books. It is respect for attention. The purpose of reading is not to accumulate completed titles or borrowed conclusions. It is to encounter something that can be recognized, tested, and perhaps lived.

A sentence may become a seed crystal. Around it, scattered experiences suddenly assume a pattern. But the pattern remains provisional. Life continues to add material for me to test and either integrate or reject.

I no longer imagine a final version of myself waiting at the end of all this work. "A work in progress" is not an apology attached to the title. It is the nature of the thing. Completion, for a living person, would be indistinguishable from stopping. The goal is not endless dissatisfaction with myself, nor a frantic program of optimization.

I cannot claim meaningful mastery of anything. But I think I have come to understand something large. The form is never merely the form. The body is never merely the body.

Tinkering begins with affection for the thing being worked on. I adjust my practice because I intend to remain in it. I train the body because I live here. I examine a belief because truth matters more than possession of the belief.

A discipline sincerely followed opens into everything else. We begin by trying to learn an art and may discover, years later, that the art has been teaching us how to learn, notice, change, and remain.

Discipline is not rigidity. Discipline gives me a structure within which I can become less rigid. It is a gentle persistence, a “returning to the mean” after whatever life throws at me. This is the essence of tinkering.

I haven't, by tinkering, assembled a system so much as accumulated an ecology of practices which interact with and illuminate one another.

A life of tinkering depends upon things one does not casually discard. Change becomes meaningful because it occurs against a background of commitment.

The Stoic concept of amor fati - the love of one's fate - belongs here too. On social media, people sometimes ask what we would change if we could go back in time. My answer is nothing.

Alter one event and I do not merely repair an isolated mistake; I create a different life, populated by different people and culminating in a different man looking back. Who can say that life would be better?

To inhabit a life is to accept its material. The artist does not begin with every possible canvas. He begins with this one: the one in front of him. Give me this life, the one I am living right now.

Acceptance is not passivity. Loving the material does not mean refusing to shape it. On the contrary, it makes the work possible. I can accept my age without surrendering to it, accept my history without being imprisoned by it, and accept my limitations while continuing to test whether they are real.

The art lies in knowing what must be borne, what can be changed, and what can simply be released. That knowledge does not arrive once and for all. It is cultivated through a lifetime of tinkering.

So I remain in the arena. Not to prove that age has no effect, and not because I expect some final triumph. I remain because participation is the point. There are still things to learn and assumptions to examine, still strength to build and friendships to deepen. There is still more of this life to inhabit.

Philosophy gives us castles: courage, wisdom, tranquility, the life of an artist. Practice lays the stones beneath them, one ordinary day at a time.

Acceptance without resignation. Discipline without rigidity. Tradition without bondage. Practice without a fantasy of completion. Tinkering without dissatisfaction with the thing being tinkered with.

The work will never be finished. That is not its failure. That is its life: a life inhabited. 

Tuesday, October 06, 2026

Boring Practice


Over at Thoughts on Tai Chi, there is a nice article on what it may mean to be bored with one's practice. An excerpt is below. The full post may be read here.

It is my opinion that if you're bored in your practice, then you're not doing it right.

I’ve actually never really understood why people ask about if Tai Chi is boring. You know – doing the form, practicing the same exercises over and over again. No, I’ve never found it boring. There’s just too much going on to be bored. Just keeping to adjust your own alignment and keeping relaxed as you you move, and as the balance keep changing, is not as simple as it could seem. Perfecting something seemingly simple is not something you do just by repeating movements. You need to be aware, practice with awareness, or as the Chinese say: “use heart“.

Well, you really need to put your heart in what you do. If not, well, frankly said – it would become boring. But if you do put your heart into the practice, I don’t think form practice could become boring. I find the opposite to be truth – not that I am excited every time I practice, but opposite to time moving slowly, I find the time moving fast. If I practice a whole Yang form, slowly and focused, the time just flies away and after the session I wonder where the time went.

But here is the thing with time: it is something psychological. If you don’t like what you do, or if you do something you don’t want to do and just wait for the time to pass, then the time will pass slowly. And that goes for everything you do.

You need to fill the time with meaning. Which means that you have to like what you do, because only if you like something you do it doesn’t become boring. So to answer if Tai Chi is boring, I would first ask if you like the practice or not, and if you find it rewarding.

And here is something I want to be honest about – I don’t believe that Tai Chi is for everyone. In the long-term specifically, I think you need to be of a certain personality, or rather – have a sort of mind-set to stay a Tai Chi practitioner. It demands a certain kind of view on reality and yourself. I say this because I have seen practitioners suddenly stop and give up their Tai Chi after even 30 or 40 years of practice. Some people just made a full stop, while others drifted towards other internal arts as bagua, harder styles as White Crane, and yet others towards arts as Yoga or similar.

Saturday, October 03, 2026

A Master at Work


Some time ago, I posted an excerpt from a lengthy review of Mathew Crawford's first book, Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry Into the Value of Work. Since then, he's written a couple more books and has also begun a Substack. At his Substack, Archedelia,  there is a very nice article about someone whom he considers a master at his craft. An excerpt is below. The full post may be read here.

---

A while back I pitched the editor of Hagerty Drivers Club Magazine on an idea to write a profile of my machinist. The article appears in the current issue of the magazine (print only), but we arranged it so I can share it with readers of Archedelia as well. Labor Day seems like a good day to release it, so here you go. For this assignment I teamed up with my friend Henri Boulanger, a Bay Area photographer, motorcyclist and lover of all things vehicular or musical. You can find more of his work at his site; I encourage you to check it out. -Matt

Not people who know how to Google it, or AI-prompt it, but who have a web of knowledge in their heads that is vast and detailed and synoptic, and who are able to synthesize it on the fly to arrive at some practical solution. This kind of knowledge accumulates over the course of a lifetime, slowly ripening and finding its way into their bones, to the point they probably couldn’t tell you how they know what they know.

Ken Jansen is the go-to machinist for the performance air-cooled Volkswagen cadres of Northern California. For the drag racers, in particular. Full-bodied Bugs powered by his motors have made it well into the 10s in the quarter mile. That’s all motor (no boost, no bottle). With boost, he has one customer who is currently in the 8s.

Ken’s shop, Jansen Enterprise, is in Belmont, which is perhaps the least glamorous of those unglamorous towns that dot the northern Peninsula of the San Francisco Bay Area. It may come as a surprise that there could remain anything like a “town” in this sprawling metropolis, which attracts the sleekly credentialled from every corner of the globe. But in places such as Belmont and Redwood City, one finds pockets of residents who grew up and still work in the place where they were born. There is still an industrial ecosystem of little shops tucked away, often with no storefront, where mechanics and machinists continue to hang on by a thread under the shadow of Big Tech. They represent the area’s last vestige of a certain middle-class type, defined not by income so much as by disposition: tradespeople who are self-employed, have no truck with computerized bureaucracy, and whose attitude to the surrounding powers is proud rather than servile. These survivors are the ones who had the wisdom and the means to buy their buildings thirty or forty years ago.

I found my way to Ken initially because I wanted to get the bearing journals on a crankshaft polished. I cut my teeth on Volkswagens as a teenager growing up in the Bay Area in the 1980s. After an extended foray into motorcycle repair and fabrication in Virginia, I returned to my VW roots in my late 40s. I also returned to the Bay Area in 2019. Asking around for a machinist, I was told by other shops to call Ken.

Looking up his location, I got an uncanny feeling. This is going to require an autobiographical digression before we get back to Ken – a brief story about remembrance and the transmission of some tiny, meaningful corner of the world from one generation to the next. I suspect such stewardship is what keeps the world as a whole from petering out.

The year is 1982 or thereabouts. Charles Martin (Chas to his friends) was a machinist by training. He worked the parts counter at Donsco, a VW speed shop in Belmont. He also built race motors for them and pitted for their off-road racing campaigns. Once a classical guitar-playing Buddhist vegetarian, he was now a gun freak and brilliant misanthropist. He still had long hair, but it was rarely released from the bun under his tweed cap. His orange, split-window VW bus, with wheel wells cut away to accommodate large off-road tires in the back, was a chaotic treasure trove of superb American handguns, Snap-On tools, and VW parts. The darkness behind the cab carried a sharp note of Berryman’s B- 12 Chemtool on top of a more subtle smell that is generic to mechanics—a mixed-up aroma of various petroleum distillates that had been oxidized by combustion, thickened with road grime, and ripened on a substrate of shop rags to the point of acquiring substance. He kept a large tank of CO2 in his bus for running an air impact wrench, indispensable for swapping out a broken transaxle on a race car in the desert. This bus was his only personal space, and at this time cell phones were something you saw only in the movies. Outside Donsco business hours, you reached Chas by calling the Lyons restaurant in San Mateo, where he manned a certain stool at one end of the coffee counter.

Oppressed in my seventeen-year-old way by the liberal pieties of the time, I had recently taken to wearing combat boots to Berkeley High and reading Soldier of Fortune magazine. But Chas was something different, the first genuine reactionary I ever met. Deeply cynical and deeply witty, he loosened up these angry tendencies of mine with his corrosive humor. By that I mean he both lubricated them and dissolved them, like penetrating oil. He also initiated me into a certain positive possibility opened up by alienation from all things respectable: the pleasures of metal.

Friday, September 25, 2026

The Cultural Pecking Order of Japanese Martial Arts


There was an interesting post at The Budo Journeyman about how the Japanese themselves view their own native martial arts. An excerpt is below. The full post may be read here.

In his book about training in Shotokan karate in Japan, Richard Amos subverted the usual understanding of the ‘3 K’s’ of karate (Kihon, Kata and Kumite) and said that the Japanese public generally saw karate as a different ‘3 K’s’:

· Kitsui (きつい): Hard / Demanding / Exhausting.

· Kiken (危険): Dangerous.

· Kitanai (汚い): Dirty.

It looks like karate has an image problem.

Social understanding.

This just reinforced something I had heard earlier.

I was first introduced to this idea by my good friend Mike Cundy, a long-standing Kyudo (archery) practitioner, who had lived in Japan in the 1970’s (see my two-part interview with Mike. The Bow and the Brush. Part 1. - by Tim Shaw ).

He explained that there was a distinct social hierarchy in the image of martial arts in Japan. Put simply; you had Iaido and Kyudo at the top, and at the very bottom, the potentially thuggish karate guys. (I will dig into this a little later).

Why does the arts of sword drawing and archery sit at the top of the tree?

It’s simple. These two disciplines have the opposite of an image problem. Here’s a few of their positive points:

· Historical high-status association with an aristocratic Samurai past.

· High aesthetic value.

· Deep spiritual and intellectual credentials.

· Relatively high profile, despite its throwback historical connections.

· Likely to be engaged in by people in the higher socio-economic category.

· (Linked to the above) can include expensive kit.

Add to that, both disciplines involve zero contact. Unless you are incredibly clumsy, it is extremely unlikely you will have the embarrassing problem of having to appear before a high-level board meeting with a black eye.

These people give off the aura of having a cultured refinement, and, in a way, their arts are very performative and make a clear social statement.

The two arts are entirely devoid of any practical modern age fighting function. However, they have allowed a competitive factor to creep in, but judged on pure precision, control and form (notice, no creative interpretation, this is not Ice Dance). It is purely for the specialists. Casual viewers would just wonder what the heck was going on?


Saturday, September 12, 2026

Koryu Budo


Over at Peter Boylan's excellent The Budo Bum substack, there was recently an article on his thoughts on training in Koryu Budo, old Budo; before the advent of Judo, Karatedo, Aikido, etc. An excerpt is below. The full post may be read here.

I practice Shinto Muso Ryu Jodo and Shinto Hatakage Ryu Iai Heiho. I also practice Kodokan Judo. Kodokan Judo was founded as Japan made the leap from a rural, agrarian, preindustrial society to an urban, mechanized, industrial powerhouse. The differences between practicing the old arts and the new(er) ones are remarkable.

Kodokan Judo was founded during an era of incredible transformation in Japan. The Tokugawa Shogunate had just been overthrown after some 266 years of peaceful rule and replaced with a constitutional monarchy. The founder of Kodokan Judo, Kano Jigoro Shihan, replaced the classical menkyo teaching licensing system with a series of dan (steps). Adapting European teaching pedagogies, he designed a system of teaching that could be used in public schools for mass education. Under his Kodokan Judo, you could go anywhere in the country and train without having to learn a local set of techniques and customs. Your rank was recognized all over the country.

Koryu budo, on the other hand, are not taught as competitive sports, or even as cultural practices for the general public. They are taught in the same way that traditional crafts are taught in Japan: slowly, carefully, from one teacher to one student. I can train judo under one teacher, and still freely go to train in many different dojos. That’s not the case in koryu. Even if there are many other dojos doing the same koryu in your area (highly unlikely), you are learning your teacher’s art; not a generalized, public set of skills, but a highly individualized art. If you go around to other dojo, you’re going to get lots of input that is different from your teacher’s, which could slow down, not speed up, the process of internalizing the lessons your teacher is giving you.

Koryu budo, like traditional crafts in Japan, are learned through imitation of the teacher, including rigorous thought by the student about why the teacher does particular things in a particular way. A good teacher will give students time to figure things out, and will emphasize particular lessons through their actions rather than their words. The teacher will lay things out where the student can see them. It’s up to the student to develop the observational skills to pick up the lessons when the teacher makes them visible.

Those observational skills aren’t easy if you don’t come from a culture where they are expected from birth. My learning growing up initially revolved around the teacher laying things out and showing us how to ask questions about the things we didn’t understand. Learning to ask questions was a big part of the education process. Observational skills were not a noticeable part of the process.

Koryu budo, on the other hand, are not taught as competitive sports, or even as cultural practices for the general public. They are taught in the same way that traditional crafts are taught in Japan: slowly, carefully, from one teacher to one student. I can train judo under one teacher, and still freely go to train in many different dojos. That’s not the case in koryu. Even if there are many other dojos doing the same koryu in your area (highly unlikely), you are learning your teacher’s art; not a generalized, public set of skills, but a highly individualized art. If you go around to other dojo, you’re going to get lots of input that is different from your teacher’s, which could slow down, not speed up, the process of internalizing the lessons your teacher is giving you.

Koryu budo, like traditional crafts in Japan, are learned through imitation of the teacher, including rigorous thought by the student about why the teacher does particular things in a particular way. A good teacher will give students time to figure things out, and will emphasize particular lessons through their actions rather than their words. The teacher will lay things out where the student can see them. It’s up to the student to develop the observational skills to pick up the lessons when the teacher makes them visible.

Those observational skills aren’t easy if you don’t come from a culture where they are expected from birth. My learning growing up initially revolved around the teacher laying things out and showing us how to ask questions about the things we didn’t understand. Learning to ask questions was a big part of the education process. Observational skills were not a noticeable part of the process.

Tuesday, August 25, 2026

A Cautionary Tale


My wife was on Facebook the other day, and noticed a trend where people were asking ChatGPT to describe them as a warning to someone who might meet them. It's an interesting spin. 

I did it and have pasted it below. My kids think it's spot on.

If I were warning someone before they met you, I’d probably say:


“You should know what you’re getting into.”


He looks fairly harmless. That’s part of the problem.


He’s curious in a way that makes ordinary conversation dangerous. You can start with a book, a martial art, a quotation, or some apparently minor observation, and before long you’re discussing Stoicism, mimetic desire, craftsmanship, the nature of mastery, or what it means to live a good life. He doesn’t merely collect ideas. He cross-pollinates them.


He also has a very low tolerance for intellectual mush. If something sounds fashionable but empty, he’ll poke it with a stick. If something is genuinely useful, he’ll keep worrying at it until he has figured out how it fits with everything else he believes.


And beware of saying, “That’s interesting.”

He may ask why.


He has been practicing martial arts long enough that he has gradually stopped being particularly interested in martial arts as a collection of techniques. The deeper question has become what practice does to a person. This has infected the rest of his life. Walking the dog can become practice. Weightlifting can become practice. Reading can become practice. Writing can become practice. Apparently even slowing down can become a philosophical proposition.


He is also an essentialist, which means he is continually trying to remove things from his life while simultaneously acquiring books about things he absolutely does not need to know. Do not point out the contradiction. He knows.


He has a peculiar relationship with tradition. He respects it deeply, but he doesn’t worship it. His instinct is something like: learn the tradition thoroughly enough that you can eventually discover what you actually think. This makes him simultaneously conservative about fundamentals and rather independent about conclusions.


His blog has been running for more than twenty years, which should tell you something about persistence. He has accumulated a substantial mental attic in that time, and every so often he opens a trunk and pulls out an idea from fifteen years ago that turns out to connect rather inconveniently well with something he just read yesterday.


He is also liable to tell you about some obscure quotation he remembers approximately, from a book whose title he can’t quite recall, and then become mildly obsessed with finding the exact wording.


Do not underestimate the “mildly.”


There is another hazard: he actually likes thinking things through with another person. Not debating for sport. Not collecting agreement. Thinking. If you offer a useful idea, he will take it, turn it over, connect it to three other things, and hand it back considerably more interesting than when you gave it to him.


And if you happen to say something that really resonates with him, you may accidentally become part of a book he hasn’t written yet.


So, yes, meet him.


Just allow more time than you think you need.


And whatever you do, don’t casually mention that you’ve been thinking about the nature of mastery.