At Plum Publications, Ted Mancuso wrote an article comparing hard and soft martial arts, specifically Taijiquan and Hung Gar. An excerpt is below. The full post may be read here.
It’s important to start this right. We have to distinguish between soft
and hard, and internal or external. Let’s be honest, all styles of Kung
Fu start as ”External styles”. But styles may be hard or soft and still
be external or internal. Another way to say this is that all kung fu
aims at occupying the center of the map. If you start in the north you
will move southward. If you start in east you will traverse to the west.
The point is that we often call this or that style external or hard or
soft without understanding that even in the most extreme cases, a proper
style covers all four of these corners.
I want to compare two styles that most people might consider to be
extremely opposed to one another. But Tai Chi and Hung Gar kung fu are
not really that antithetical. In fact, as we will see, they share a
great deal in common though that might not be as obvious as we would
like.
Of course people who study Tai Chi assume it is a soft, slow and
internal style as if these things were all the same. But as we said
earlier, all training starts externally because that is the only way you
can start. However, in some cases the training starts with the hard
external and in some cases with the soft external. At which point the
training starts to reverse its direction and go toward the opposite
direction is very dependent not only on the style, but on efforts of the
student and intelligence of the instructor.
There is also the issue of completeness. For instance, in Tai Chi, few
practitioners wish to master the entire system. Therefore those aspects
of Tai Chi in which you develop strength, create power, or condition the
body are rarely seen by the majority of students. It may be a shock to
say, but Tai Chi has body conditioning and other means of strengthening
it to withstand blows. Though it rarely engages in exercise like iron
palm training, there are equivalent exercises to develop strength and
power in the limbs. Most people who study Tai Chi for at least a few
years know that there are times when power and force issuance are
clearly shown. Sometimes they may only see this when their instructor’s
demonstrate, or give a private lesson; but it is there.
Let’s compare Tai Chi with Hung Gar. The first clue that the so-called
“external style” of hung gar is really something a little more
sophisticated that it first appears, comes with the one thing which Hung
shares with Tai Chi; something so obvious it is overlooked. Both of
these styles have sections at least, of very slow motion action. Many
parts of the Hung style move very slowly, relative to the speed possible
by a reputable martial artist. Why, you should ask yourself, are the
Hung Gar styles moving so slowly? Surely it cannot be for combat
purposes. There are a number of aspects to the answer but at least some
of these are because Hung players are focusing their attention and their
actions internally, that is to say, at the appropriate pace and amount
of strength linked with their intent. By the same token, Hung uses its
famous Shaolin Temple five animals—especially the Dragon and the
snake—to practice a more relaxed and fluid motion. The percentage of
this type of motion increases as does the skill level of the Hung
practitioner. You can actually see, If you’re exposed to enough of the
Hung style, the transformation from early sets, such as Gong Chi Fuk Fu,
to the Advanced sets such as iron wire, a very clear progression from
hard towards soft and external toward internal. This does not even count
such internal but hard training as the golden Bell or iron body.
No comments:
Post a Comment