The autumn leaves are falling like rain. Although my neighbors are all barbarians and you, you are a thousand miles away, there are always two cups at my table.

T’ang Dynasty poem

Ten thousand flowers in spring, the moon in autumn, a cool breeze in summer, snow in winter. If your mind isn't clouded by unnecessary things, this is the best season of your life.

~ Wu-men ~


Friday, March 22, 2013

Supercharge Your Training

A long time ago while filling a contract position, I found myself seated next to a Chinese PhD. He took an interest in me because of my interest in Asian things.

 

He once told me a saying; I don’t remember exactly how it goes, that when you have tried everything you can think of, but just can’t seem to get anywhere – change. Change your point of view, your methods; anything, everything. Change.

 

Whenever I find that my practice has been interrupted for some reason such as illness or injury; I am idle and I can’t do anything about it, I take the opportunity to really examine what it is that I am doing and why. I tear by practice down and build it back up so that when I am able to practice again, I can hit the ground running to achieve something new. 

I can't tell you how many times I've stopped what I had been doing and began again a different way. Some times I'd return to an older way I had trained, but with a new insight.

 

Do you find yourself training hard; putting in the time, but not getting the results you are striving for? Then maybe you need to change something. Below is an article that appeared in The New York Times. I think it resonates really well with article published a few months ago on Deliberate Practice. The original article may be read here. The article is a foretaste of a book and a link to the book is at the bottom.

Secret Ingredient for Success


David Chang’s experience is instructive.

Mr. Chang is an internationally renowned, award-winning Korean-American chef, restaurateur and owner of the Momofuku restaurant group with eight restaurants from Toronto to Sydney, and other thriving enterprises, including bakeries and bars, a PBS TV show, guest spots on HBO’s “Treme” and a foodie magazine, Lucky Peach. He says he worked himself to the bone to realize his dream — to own a humble noodle bar.

He spent years cooking in some of New York City’s best restaurants, apprenticed in different noodle shops in Japan and then, finally, worked 18-hour days in his tiny restaurant, Momofuku Noodle Bar.

Mr. Chang could barely pay himself a salary. He had trouble keeping staff. And he was miserably stressed.

He recalls a low moment when he went with his staff on a night off to eat burgers at a restaurant that was everything his wasn’t — packed, critically acclaimed and financially successful. He could cook better than they did, he thought, so why was his restaurant failing? “I couldn’t figure out what the hell we were doing wrong,” he told us.

Mr. Chang could have blamed someone else for his troubles, or worked harder (though available evidence suggests that might not have been possible) or he could have made minor tweaks to the menu. Instead he looked inward and subjected himself to brutal self-assessment.

Was the humble noodle bar of his dreams economically viable? Sure, a traditional noodle dish had its charm but wouldn’t work as the mainstay of a restaurant if he hoped to pay his bills.

Mr. Chang changed course. Rather than worry about what a noodle bar should serve, he and his cooks stalked the produce at the greenmarket for inspiration. Then they went back to the kitchen and cooked as if it was their last meal, crowding the menu with wild combinations of dishes they’d want to eat — tripe and sweetbreads, headcheese and flavor-packed culinary mashups like a Korean-style burrito. What happened next Mr. Chang still considers “kind of ridiculous” — the crowds came, rave reviews piled up, awards followed and unimaginable opportunities presented themselves.

During the 1970s, Chris Argyris, a business theorist at Harvard Business School (and now, at 89, a professor emeritus) began to research what happens to organizations and people, like Mr. Chang, when they find obstacles in their paths.

Professor Argyris called the most common response single loop learning — an insular mental process in which we consider possible external or technical reasons for obstacles.
LESS common but vastly more effective is the cognitive approach that Professor Argyris called double-loop learning. In this mode we — like Mr. Chang — question every aspect of our approach, including our methodology, biases and deeply held assumptions. This more psychologically nuanced self-examination requires that we honestly challenge our beliefs and summon the courage to act on that information, which may lead to fresh ways of thinking about our lives and our goals.

In interviews we did with high achievers for a book, we expected to hear that talent, persistence, dedication and luck played crucial roles in their success. Surprisingly, however, self-awareness played an equally strong role.

The successful people we spoke with — in business, entertainment, sports and the arts — all had similar responses when faced with obstacles: they subjected themselves to fairly merciless self-examination that prompted reinvention of their goals and the methods by which they endeavored to acheive them.

The tennis champion Martina Navratilova, for example, told us that after a galling loss to Chris Evert in 1981, she questioned her assumption that she could get by on talent and instinct alone. She began a long exploration of every aspect of her game. She adopted a rigorous cross-training practice (common today but essentially unheard of at the time), revamped her diet and her mental and tactical game and ultimately transformed herself into the most successful women’s tennis player of her era.

The indie rock band OK Go described how it once operated under the business model of the 20th-century rock band. But when industry record sales collapsed and the band members found themselves creatively hamstrung by their recording company, they questioned their tactics. Rather than depend on their label, they made wildly unconventional music videos, which went viral, and collaborative art projects with companies like Google, State Farm and Range Rover, which financed future creative endeavors. The band now releases albums on its own label.

No one’s idea of a good time is to take a brutal assessment of their animating assumptions and to acknowledge that those may have contributed to their failure. It’s easy to find pat ways to explain why the world has not adequately rewarded our efforts. But what we learned from conversation with high achievers is that challenging our assumptions, objectives, at times even our goals, may sometimes push us further than we thought possible. Ask David Chang, who never imagined that sweetbreads and duck sausage rice cakes with kohlrabi and mint would find their way beside his humble noodle dishes — and make him a star.

Camille Sweeney and Josh Gosfield are the authors of the forthcoming book “The Art of Doing: How Superachievers Do What They Do and How They Do It So Well.”




5 comments:

walt said...

"...take a brutal assessment of their animating assumptions..."

Good advice in many areas.

"...sweetbreads and duck sausage rice cakes with kohlrabi and mint..."

As a denizen of Michigan, I'm going to guess you can understand the attraction of such delicacies as, according to Wikipedia, Hamburg Township, Michigan has titled itself the "Kohlrabi Capital of the World". They used to hold a kohlrabi festival every year, and in 1985 it drew 600 people, the largest attendance in the festival's history.

And your suggestion to "know what you're doing and why" strikes me as the heart of effective practice.

Rick said...

When we're talking about stuff cabbage, then kohlrabi becomes a very important part of the conversation.

Paul said...

Change is a piece of excellent advice, but "change what" is the issue. The sage (author) of I-ching was wise, his return mesmerized the faithful with a riddle like saying to guide change, which is needed by definition (with possible variations of such riddle, as if to challenge the most intellectually inclined ones). The faithful's mind will be on hold, and in a position in search of novel change. But then, the faithful most be faithful in the first place (i.e. without a very critical/analytical mind). That's why Confucius, in commenting I-ching, said, "those who understand I-ching don't need to use I-ching", and Confucius was smart. For the modern man, it is called "suspension of disbelief" (or "just assumed that you're stupid and need a novel solution for the simple problem you're facing").

....if you're not following me, probably you should ask I-ching...:):)

Rick said...

Thanks, Paul. There is a lot of wisdom in the I Ching and I've begun to slowly crawl through it as sort of a background activity, line by line.

CARDINAL999 said...

Even the classical strategists have realized that the Yi Jing concepts and the various Sunzi principles worked effectively when integrated in unison. "Identifying where to use it, determining how to use it and deciding when to use it" are some parts of the grander mystery to those who are interested in their arcane subject matter.