What Kata Isn't
Let’s
get this straight. Classical martial arts kata are not practice
fighting. They are not what fighting is or was. Martial arts kata do
not simulate combat conditions. They do not recreate actual combat
scenarios. If kata aren’t any of these things, then what are they, and
why bother with them?
Kata
are pre-arranged training sequences. Kata are training scenarios for
learning about essential elements of conflict. I train in both
classical and modern Japanese martial arts, and both use a lot of kata.
Classical arts tend to focus almost entirely on kata training. Gendai
arts like Judo use a combination of formal kata training,
randori/sparring, and informal kata.
Kata
are not for mimicking combat . Kata are for getting better at combat.
They are a training tool for learning the skills necessary for dealing
with combat. They are an exceptional tool that has survived hundreds of
years of testing and application. As a training tool, they provide a
framework for practicing various aspects of combat, not just repeating
techniques or practicing in a sparring situation where much of what is
effective is not acceptable because of the risk of injury.
Kata
is not sparring, and with good reason. All sparring assumes a dueling
scenario. 2 people faced off and fighting. Any equipment is equal.
There are no surprises, no unexpected changes. There is an assumption
of fairness. Kata is not handicapped by any of these of these
assumptions. Kata allows a much broader investigation of conflict
conditions.
2 comments:
Kata are not for mimicking combat. Kata are for getting better at combat. They are a training tool for learning the skills necessary for dealing with combat.
I've always been a bit bemused about how the techniques I practice don't really fit real-life situations. This explanation makes perfect sense - and yet I really never looked at it that way until now. Eight-plus years of Aikido and I know so little about it!
Kata fits in perfectly with the idea of deliberate practice, in my opinion.
Post a Comment